Reflections on Libertarianism

Libertarianism As a Christina view, in the beginning of the time, For in Him all things were created things in Heaven and on Earth, visible and invisible, whether thr bingles or powers or rulers or governing all things shoot been created through Him and for Him (Colossians 1 16). Human beings were created by theology with one purpose to worship to Him. beau ideal knew that the first man and fair sex were going to fall d have got in the enemy temptation. That is why He created every single thing perfectly. However, we study the history through the volume or another(prenominal) kind of books.We will see that few concourse fallowed that commitment and other batch did things that argon not pleasing to Him. idol hoped to receive worship from them, alone it was not like that. God is a gentleman, He never is going to burden us to do things that we do not urgency to do. He gave us freedom or freewill to do whatever we want to and chooses between the right-hand(a) or evil. eit her single humans act will have its reward. As the Scriptures conjectures that there are two ways, a big one and teeny-weeny one. In the big way, many people go in that way because is easier however, it shoots to the perdition.The small way is the opposite sorting (Mathew 7 13-14). The humans stages start born, growing, reproducing, and dying. While, the people still alive, Each mind is a cosmea (Kay, 1998, p. 163). We do distinct things from others and we do not care what others think about us because we have libertarianism. What is libertarianism? It is a particular account of the metaphysics of human survival of the fittest (Stewart, Blocker & Petrik, 2012, p. 154). The libertarianism is also used in philosophy and it butt end strike to the freedom, liberty, indemnify, and freewill.They are fundamental goods that presidential terms should be extremely slow to restrict them. wide time ago, there were many slaves did not count with those goods, they knew to work for s omeone. We squirt imagine that it was hard to live in that time, now we see different when someone left from the jail and the person is free. He stills happy and he does not want to come back again. As human beings have the knowledge to understand which things are poorly and good. Libertarianism has pro and con or for and against.For example, I go to buy a used video peppy to Game Stop, I am going to buy it because I want it or like it, and I do not care other people think about me. In this example there are both. The pro could be that it is cheaper than the new one, but the con may be does not work well. I have the right to do anything, you saybut not everything is beneficial. I have the right to do anythingbut not everything is constructive (Corinthians 10 23). Libertarianism is based on the principles of Self-Ownership. It means that I have to live my own animateness and let others live their lives. Self-Ownership is to deny, this is to think that another person has a higher claim on your purport than you do (Norquist, 2005). No, other person or group of people, own your liveness nor do you own the lives of others. For example a person exist in times and it is manifest as agone (product of your life and liberty), present (freedom or rights) and future (life). If we turn a loss the life, then we lose our future. However, if we lose the freedom, then we lose the present or if we lose the product of our life, then we lose the past that includes our knowledge. The product if our life and our liberty is our property.Property is the fruit of our labor and the product of the time, talents, and energy. As a human being, property is part of us it is our nature, which we turn to important use. At times, some people use force or actor to take form other without voluntary consent. Examples of them are if someone takes the life of other is murder, about liberty is slavery and property is theft. We have the right to protect our own lives, liberty and property from the forceful aggression of others. Also, we can ask for help to others to defend us (parents) because they never want bad thing for their children.Nevertheless, we have to be sure that we are not initiating to force against the life, liberty, and property of others. We have the right to seek for a leader for ourselves to drive us, but we do not have rights to impose rulers onto others. Since we our own life, we are responsible for our lives. We do not ret our lives from other humans who hold obedience. We studied in the beginning the God created us and well(p) to Him we should translate up obedience and worship to Him however we do not do it. We are living in the dump time that is why God does not destroy us yet. For the law was given through Moses grace and truth came through Jesus Christ (John 1 17). Nor are we slaves form others who demand our sacrifice. In our lives, we choose our own goals based on our own vales, those values can go downs and ups however we will reach one of the goal. Success and failure both are necessary incentives to learn and to grow. Our actions on behalf of others or their actions behalf of us, it is virtuous notwithstanding when it is derived firm voluntary, mutual and consent. For virtue just can exist only where there is free choice.It is not only the just about practical and humanitarian foundation for human action, it is also the most ethical. The problems in the world that rise up from initiation of force by government have a solution. The solution is for the people of the Earth to stop request government officials and initiate force on their behalf. Evil does not arise only form evil people, but also from good people who tolerant the initiation of forces as means to their own ends. In this manner, good people have empowered evil people through the history. Achieving a free society requires courage to think, to talk and to act. I do not understand what I do. For what I want to do I do not do, but what I hate I do ( Romans 7 15). References (1998). King James Bible. (KJV ed. , Vol. Deuteronomy). Nashville, TN Cornerstone Bible Publishers. Kay B. Warren (1998). Indigenous movements and their critics. unite Kingdom Princeton University Press, 41 Street Princeton, New Jersey 08540. 163. Norquist, G. (2005). Ownership keep Be Revolutionary. American Enterprise,16(2), 50. Stewart, D. , Blocker, G. H. , & Petrik, J. (2012). Fundamentals of philosophy. (8th ed. ed. ). New York Pearson.